Monday, March 18, 2013

2013 Preseason Prediction #9 – Jhonny Peralta

This would be a good time to show the differences between Baseball Reference and FanGraphs as far as batted ball data is concerned. Both sites get their information from different sources (Baseball Reference from Retrosheet and FanGraphs from Baseball Info Solutions) and so there are some differences in how they categorize line drives, ground balls and fly balls. Normally it's small enough that the same conclusions can be drawn regardless of which site is used.

Using Jhonny Peralta as an example:


2010 GB FB LD Total Batted Ball
FanGraphs
157
199
102
458
Baseball Reference
158
192
107
457

The difference in ground balls was 1, the difference in fly balls was 7 and the difference in line drives was 5. There is a difference in total batted balls because Baseball Reference classified one of the batted balls as a bunt.


2011 GB FB LD Total Batted Ball
FanGraphs
157
194
88
439
Baseball Reference
161
195
83
439

Again, there's not much difference; 4 in ground balls, 1 in fly balls and 5 in line drives.


2012 GB FB LD Total Batted Ball
FanGraphs
177
157
94
428
Baseball Reference
182
171
75
428

Now there's a noticeable difference. While the difference in ground balls is only 5, fly balls have a difference of 14 and line drives have a difference of 19.

This is a big difference since FanGraphs says Peralta had a 22.0% line drive rate (94/428) but Baseball Reference says Peralta had a 17.5% line drive rate (75/428). A very simple xBABIP formula is to add .120 to the line drive rate. It's a very quick "luck" formula for someone who doesn't want to do a lot of work. Peralta had a .275 BABIP in 2012 and using FanGraphs' LD rate would give him an xBABIP of .340. Using Baseball Reference's LD rate would give Peralta an xBABIP of .295. One shows that Peralta was very unlucky while the other shows that he was only slightly unlucky.


FanGraphs
Baseball Reference
BABIP
LD
xBABIP
LD
xBABIP
2010
0.275
22.3%
0.343
23.4%
0.354
2011
0.325
20.0%
0.320
18.9%
0.309
2012
0.275
22.0%
0.340
17.5%
0.295
Career
0.310
20.3%
0.323
19.1%
0.311


According to these numbers, it looks like 2011 was similar to his career average and thus that is his true talent level. However, it's always good to look at the most recent seasons for future performance. 2012 and 2010 look very similar (more so just looking at FanGraphs) and therefore 2011 would be the outlier. Peralta could just be an exception and he'll look like he's underperforming his batted ball data, since he's now done it twice in his most recent 3 seasons when really that's just his true talent level. So now the question is, will Peralta have a season like his 2011 and career, or will it be more like 2010 and 2012? And which one was a better representation of what happened in 2012, FanGraphs or Baseball Reference?

I'm going to say Peralta's most recent seasons overrule career. It's always better to be conservative with predictions anyway.

Experts' Predictions/Projections:



AB AVG OBP SLG HR RBI SB BB K
Steamer
436
0.258
0.321
0.410
12
57
1
40
83
Oliver
518
0.253
0.316
0.407
16
68
2
47
102
ZiPS
531
0.258
0.318
0.395
14
71
1
45
103
Bill James
530
0.264
0.329
0.423
16
74
1
49
108
RotoChamp
520
0.267
0.330
0.415
14
69
1
47
102
CBS Sports
540
0.252
0.312
0.398
14
68
0
47
108
ESPN
535
0.264
0.323
0.426
17
78
1
48
100
MLB.com
543
0.260
0.322
0.427
18
69
1
-
-
FanGraphs' Fans (20)
527
0.256
0.308
0.400
14
66
0
41
106
Update: 4/1

My Prediction:



AB AVG OBP SLG HR RBI SB BB K
2012 Prediction
539
0.278
0.335
0.456
22
84
0
48
100
2012 Actual
531
0.239
0.305
0.384
13
63
1
49
105
2013 Prediction
526
0.241
0.305
0.380
13
66
1
48
105

Fantasy Impact: Unless you're in a deep league or an AL Only league, Peralta probably should be a non-factor in the draft. If you missed out on a top shortstop, there are more intriguing ones than Peralta, including Josh Rutledge , Jean Segura and Andrelton Simmons .

No comments:

Post a Comment