The first set of stats are batted ball data, both from FanGraphs and Baseball-reference:
FanGraphs | Baseball-reference | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year
|
BABIP
|
LD%
|
GB%
|
FB%
|
LD%
|
GB%
|
FB%
|
2010
|
0.295
|
16.3%
|
45.0%
|
38.8%
|
15.5%
|
45.7%
|
38.8%
|
2011
|
0.261
|
22.9%
|
44.3%
|
32.8%
|
20.4%
|
44.8%
|
34.8%
|
2012
|
0.253
|
24.6%
|
48.2%
|
27.2%
|
19.9%
|
48.7%
|
31.4%
|
2013
|
0.325
|
19.2%
|
52.9%
|
27.9%
|
19.8%
|
52.9%
|
27.3%
|
Career
|
0.276
|
21.0%
|
49.1%
|
29.9%
|
19.1%
|
49.8%
|
31.0%
|
While before Pena had an inflated ground ball rate, now, while still high, it's more in-line of what he's done in previous seasons and his career. His BABIP seems inflated, though.
Now plate discipline numbers:
Year | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | Zone% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
31.4%
|
64.5%
|
48.5%
|
65.6%
|
90.5%
|
82.7%
|
51.7%
|
2011
|
28.7%
|
61.0%
|
45.1%
|
70.4%
|
93.9%
|
89.4%
|
50.6%
|
2012
|
31.9%
|
60.4%
|
46.5%
|
76.7%
|
94.5%
|
88.5%
|
51.1%
|
2013
|
28.6%
|
62.5%
|
45.5%
|
73.2%
|
95.0%
|
88.1%
|
49.7%
|
Career
|
30.2%
|
61.3%
|
45.7%
|
76.5%
|
93.7%
|
88.0%
|
49.8%
|
Not much difference at all. His 2.9% walk rate is the lowest it's ever been in the 5 years he's been in the majors full-time, which could be reflected by the 3.5% decrease in O-Contact%. His 10.3% strikeout rate is in-line of what he did the last 2 years. He tends to put a lot of balls in play with that 88.1% contact rate.
Brooks Baseball has a breakdown on the different pitches, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and career numbers.
4-Seam Fastball:
Year | Count | AB | BB | AVG |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
290
|
61
|
6
|
0.213
|
2011
|
440
|
91
|
6
|
0.319
|
2012
|
327
|
84
|
4
|
0.310
|
2013
|
383
|
65
|
4
|
0.308
|
Career
|
1681
|
363
|
30
|
0.289
|
Aside from 2010, Pena has been pretty consistent in hitting the fastball. This data shouldn't be taken as 100% accurate, though. From what it looks like below, some 4-seam fastballs might have been misclassified as sinkers in 2010.
Sinker:
Year | Count | AB | BB | AVG |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
136
|
33
|
2
|
0.455
|
2011
|
209
|
51
|
1
|
0.196
|
2012
|
197
|
48
|
1
|
0.208
|
2013
|
155
|
46
|
1
|
0.217
|
Career
|
890
|
228
|
6
|
0.237
|
Except for 2010, Pena has always struggled to hit sinkers, and that trend has continued in 2013. He has, however, improved in all the other pitches.
Change:
Slider:
Curve:
Year | Count | AB | BB | AVG |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
77
|
28
|
1
|
0.179
|
2011
|
153
|
46
|
2
|
0.217
|
2012
|
114
|
37
|
2
|
0.270
|
2013
|
102
|
24
|
0
|
0.500
|
Career
|
548
|
165
|
6
|
0.285
|
Slider:
Year | Count | AB | BB | AVG |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
90
|
22
|
0
|
0.227
|
2011
|
97
|
21
|
3
|
0.191
|
2012
|
96
|
23
|
3
|
0.261
|
2013
|
91
|
22
|
0
|
0.318
|
Career
|
444
|
107
|
6
|
0.243
|
Curve:
Year | Count | AB | BB | AVG |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
57
|
12
|
0
|
0.250
|
2011
|
96
|
23
|
1
|
0.174
|
2012
|
66
|
20
|
0
|
0.200
|
2013
|
69
|
16
|
0
|
0.313
|
Career
|
359
|
90
|
2
|
0.278
|
It could be that he's recognizing off-speed/breaking pitches better than he has before and that's causing greater success. Although, we are talking about small samples, so the possibility of it all being a fluke still exists. In the meantime, Pena has made great use of his playing time in the absence of Alex Avila. Offensively anyway; defense is a whole other story.
No comments:
Post a Comment