@eyeontigers @bossofrenfield Right now, Pena is far superior to Avila.Avila has been a complete turd. Pena needs more playing time right nowAs well as posts from Detroit Tigers.com message board and Motown Sports message board.
— Jonathan Knerr (@JonathanKnerr) May 21, 2013
Looking deeper in the numbers, it doesn't appear that Pena would be much of an upgrade.
First of all, historical stats say that Avila is a better hitter:
Brayan Pena:
Year | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BB% | K% | wOBA | wRC+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
174
|
0.253
|
0.306
|
0.335
|
6.9%
|
15.5%
|
0.288
|
75
|
2011
|
240
|
0.248
|
0.288
|
0.338
|
5.0%
|
10.0%
|
0.277
|
70
|
2012
|
226
|
0.236
|
0.262
|
0.321
|
4.0%
|
10.6%
|
0.254
|
55
|
2010-2012
|
640
|
0.245
|
0.284
|
0.331
|
5.2%
|
11.7%
|
0.272
|
66
|
Alex Avila:
Year | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BB% | K% | wOBA | wRC+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
333
|
0.228
|
0.316
|
0.340
|
10.8%
|
21.3%
|
0.299
|
81
|
2011
|
551
|
0.295
|
0.389
|
0.506
|
13.2%
|
23.8%
|
0.384
|
141
|
2012
|
434
|
0.243
|
0.352
|
0.384
|
14.1%
|
24.0%
|
0.327
|
104
|
2010-2012
|
1318
|
0.260
|
0.358
|
0.423
|
12.9%
|
23.2%
|
0.343
|
114
|
Even if Avila's 2011 season gets heavily discounted because of a fluky career year, his 81 wRC+ in 2010 is still better than any of the last 3 years by Pena. The only year that Pena has done better than an 81 wRC+ and had significant playing time was in 2009, when he had a 94 wRC+. The same principle of fluky career year could also be applied to that year too since he hasn't come close to matching that until the 13 games he's played so far this year.
So maybe Pena is doing something different. Maybe he's changed his approach to become a more successful hitter?
Year | BABIP | LD% | GB% | FB% |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
0.295
|
16.3%
|
45.0%
|
38.8%
|
2011
|
0.261
|
22.9%
|
44.3%
|
32.8%
|
2012
|
0.253
|
24.6%
|
48.2%
|
27.2%
|
2013
|
0.279
|
11.1%
|
57.8%
|
31.1%
|
Career
|
0.266
|
20.9%
|
48.8%
|
30.3%
|
There's definitely a huge increase of ground balls, and a decrease in line drives. Pena has 14 hits and 7 of them have been hit on the ground (including 3 infield hits). That's 50% of his hits coming from ground balls compared to 34% in both 2012 and his career. Pena isn't the fleetest of foot, so to have him have continued success by hitting ground balls instead of line drives isn't very likely. This is likely random variance from only playing in 13 games.
Here are his plate discipline numbers:
Year | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | Zone% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
31.4%
|
64.5%
|
48.5%
|
65.6%
|
90.5%
|
82.7%
|
51.7%
|
2011
|
28.7%
|
61.0%
|
45.1%
|
79.4%
|
93.9%
|
89.4%
|
50.6%
|
2012
|
31.9%
|
60.4%
|
46.5%
|
76.7%
|
94.5%
|
88.5%
|
51.1%
|
2013
|
29.5%
|
63.0%
|
45.9%
|
67.7%
|
95.2%
|
86.2%
|
48.8%
|
Career
|
30.5%
|
61.2%
|
45.8%
|
76.7%
|
93.5%
|
87.9%
|
49.8%
|
There isn't much difference in his 2013 numbers than his recent seasons or his career totals. The stat with the most difference is his O-Contact rate is lower, which means when he swings at pitches out of the strike zone, he's missing more often. That is the opposite of an improvement.
What about Avila? Is he doing something different to cause less success?
Year | BABIP | LD% | GB% | FB% |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
0.278
|
21.5%
|
43.5%
|
35.0%
|
2011
|
0.366
|
21.7%
|
37.8%
|
40.5%
|
2012
|
0.313
|
23.8%
|
46.4%
|
29.8%
|
2013
|
0.219
|
19.7%
|
50.0%
|
30.3%
|
Career
|
0.316
|
21.7%
|
42.8%
|
35.5%
|
Avila's BABIP is down almost 100 points from last year and his career. His batted ball data doesn't have a dramatic change from his previous seasons and his career. Therefore, it's reasonable to conclude that Avila is either suffering from BABIP bad luck or an injury is causing it.
Avila's plate disciple numbers:
Year | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | Zone% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010
|
23.4%
|
64.3%
|
44.2%
|
52.3%
|
86.8%
|
77.8%
|
50.7%
|
2011
|
24.7%
|
60.2%
|
43.0%
|
49.0%
|
86.1%
|
75.8%
|
51.5%
|
2012
|
20.9%
|
58.7%
|
39.3%
|
51.6%
|
82.1%
|
73.8%
|
48.8%
|
2013
|
20.3%
|
62.8%
|
42.0%
|
46.3%
|
79.3%
|
71.5%
|
51.0%
|
Career
|
22.6%
|
61.1%
|
42.1%
|
49.9%
|
84.7%
|
75.5%
|
50.5%
|
Avila's main problem is his Contact%, both in the strike zone and out of the zone. He's swinging and missing more often than he ever did, which definitely explains the increase in strikeouts (28.8% in 2013) and decrease in walks (9.6% in 2013). It's hard to imagine a 26 year old suddenly become a weaker hitter than he was a year ago, so I'm leaning towards the injury theory.
Finally, there's ZIPS rest of the season stats. While these stats don't show exactly what will happen in the future, they do show who is likely to be better for the rest of the season.
Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BB% | K% | wOBA | wRC+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brayan Pena
|
164
|
0.260
|
0.293
|
0.369
|
4.3%
|
11.8%
|
0.290
|
77
|
Alex Avila
|
351
|
0.236
|
0.334
|
0.390
|
12.6%
|
25.3%
|
0.320
|
97
|
Alex Avila may need to be replaced (or DL'd), but the answer isn't Brayan Pena.
No comments:
Post a Comment