Showing posts with label Drew Smyly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drew Smyly. Show all posts

Sunday, March 23, 2014

2014 Preseason Prediction #11 - Drew Smyly

Drew Smyly had a fantastic year in relief last year, with a 2.37 ERA, 1.04 WHIP and 81 strikeouts in 76 innings.  When the Tigers traded Doug Fister to the Nationals, that opened a spot in the rotation for Smyly.  He was a starter all through the minors and even started 18 games at the Major League level in 2012.  However, there is a durability issue here; the most amount of innings he has pitched was 126 in 2011.  


IP ERA WHIP K% BB% HR% FIP
As a Starter
95
3.79
1.21
22.3%
6.6%
3.0%
3.77
As a Reliever
80 1/3
2.96
1.12
26.8%
7.4%
1.2%
2.47

As with most pitchers, Smyly is much more effective as a reliever, but should still be good enough as a starter.  Smyly is still only 25, so he still has some time to adjust and improve if needed.  Such as improving his 5.3 innings/start.

Another area of adjusting is re-introducing his changeup, which he almost completely abandoned in relief last year.  According to Brooks Baseball, Smyly mainly throws two types of fastballs (4-seamer and cutter), a slider and, when he was starting, a changeup.  Having at least three pitches is ideal for any starter to keep hitters off balance while going through the batting order two or three times.  According to Brooks Baseball, Smyly threw 78 changeups in 2012, and all but 1 of them were against right-handed batters.  It was very ineffective as opposing batters got 4 hits in 7 AB, including  2 home runs and a triple.  Overall in his career:

BAA OBP SLG wOBA
Vs. LHB
0.204
0.254
0.315
0.252
Vs. RHB
0.249
0.311
0.425
0.319

Being left-handed, Smyly does better against left-handed batters than right-handed batters.  There's nothing alarming here as a .319 wOBA against is perfectly reasonable.  However, having an effective changeup against right-handed batters can really take Smyly to the next level.  

Experts' Predictions/Projections:

IP W/L ERA WHIP K BB
Steamer
125 9-7 3.92 1.29 110 43
Oliver
99 7-4 3.19 1.19 97 30
ZiPS
135    - 4.07 1.27 127 41
RotoChamp
134 9-6 3.69 1.27 124 42
CBS Sports
150 8-9 3.84 1.23 142 48
ESPN
168 12 W 3.91 1.27 149 54
MLB.com
179 10-9 3.72 1.28 168 58
FanGraphs' Fans (13)
161 10-9 3.75 1.21 147 46


My Prediction:

IP W/L ERA WHIP K BB
2013 Prediction
-
-
-
-
-
-
2013 Actual
76   
6-0
2.37
1.039
81
17







2014 Prediction
153 1/3
9-9
3.70
1.213
140
44


Fantasy Impact:  Smyly is an interesting case.  Due to a good strikeout rate and a potential ERA below 4.00, Smyly should be hot commodity.  However, there is a risk because of durability issues and a full season workload as a starter.  He's a good draft pick at later rounds, but use him carefully.  

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Using RE24 to Evaluate Relievers

Run expectation is one way to measure a player's effectiveness, either on offense or pitching.  In every 24-out situation, there's a different run expectation depending on the the baserunners and outs (the inning and score is irrelevant in RE24).  The difference between the run expectation at the start of a PA and the end of the PA gets charged to both the hitter and pitcher.  FanGraphs provides an example using the Red Sox and Rockies 2007 World Series game.  At the start of an inning the run expectation was .52 (this is just the league runs/league innings), then Ellsbury doubled that changed the run expectation to 1.15.  The difference between 1.15 and .52 is 0.63.  Therefore Ellsbury gets charged with +0.63 and Cook gets charged with -0.63.  

During the course of the season, these run expectation differences get added and subtracted to the player's total and at the end of the season they get a cumulative total that shows how much better they've been than league average.  Run expectation is extremely useful in generating linear weights which then can be applied to stats such as wOBA.  However, many analysts agree that RE24 can be very useful in proving relief pitcher value because they often come in and leave in the middle of an inning.  Say a starter loads the bases in the 7th inning and a reliever comes in and gives up a 3-run double and then a strikeout.  All 3 runs get charged to the starter while the reliever gets a scoreless 1/3 of an inning.  ERA doesn't properly show what happened, but RE24 does. 

The table below shows the Tigers relievers' RE24 as of games played through 8/31 provided by FanGraphs:


Player IP RE24
54 2/3
19.91
69   
16.70
14 1/3
3.50
14 1/3
1.57
11 2/3
0.93
2   
0.84
26   
-0.11
18   
-0.35
22 2/3
-2.18
19 1/3
-2.38
39   
-3.27
33   
-3.73
4   
-4.78
4 2/3
-6.02
36   
-6.46
4 1/3
-8.73

Tangotiger recently showed us how we can put RE24 on a RA9 or ERA scale:

If it helps, we can recast RE24 into an RA9 scale (i.e., similar to ERA) as follows.  Say the league average is .48 runs per inning.  Say you have a pitcher that has an RE24 of +40 runs and has pitched 200 innings.  That means the league average is .48 x 200 = 96 runs, and our pitcher here is 40 runs better than that, or 56 runs allowed.  So, his (RE24-based) RA9 is simply 56/200*9 = 2.52.
So far there have been 16,965 runs allowed in 36,380 1/3 IP for a league run/inning of 0.47 so far in 2013.  Using Joaquin Benoit as an example, he has pitched 54 2/3 innings; the league average would allow 0.47 * 54 2/3 = 25.49 runs.  Benoit has been 19.91 runs better or (25.49-19.91) 5.58 runs.  5.58 divided by 54 2/3 times 9 = 0.92.  The table below shows all of the Tigers relievers using this new metric (which I'm calling reRA9):


Player IP reRA9
Rick Porcello
2   
0.42
Joaquin Benoit
54 2/3
0.92
Jeremy Bonderman
14 1/3
2.00
Drew Smyly
69   
2.02
Jose Veras
14 1/3
3.21
Jose Ortega
11 2/3
3.48
Bruce Rondon
26   
4.23
Evan Reed
18   
4.37
Al Alburquerque
39   
4.95
Luke Putkonen
22 2/3
5.06
Darin Downs
33   
5.21
Jose Valverde
19 1/3
5.30
Phil Coke
36   
5.81
Jose Alvarez
4   
14.95
Octavio Dotel
4 2/3
15.81
Brayan Villarreal
4 1/3
22.33
We could then compare the pitcher's reRA9 to his ERA to see if he's been overvalued or undervalued:

Player IP reRA9 ERA Difference
Octavio Dotel
4 2/3
15.81
13.50
2.31
Luke Putkonen
22 2/3
5.06
2.78
2.28
Brayan Villarreal
4 1/3
22.33
20.77
1.56
Evan Reed
18   
4.37
3.00
1.37
Phil Coke
36   
5.81
5.00
0.81
Bruce Rondon
26   
4.23
3.81
0.43
Rick Porcello
2   
0.42
0.00
0.42
Al Alburquerque
39   
4.95
4.85
0.11
Jose Veras
14 1/3
3.21
3.14
0.07
Darin Downs
33   
5.21
5.18
0.03
Drew Smyly
69   
2.02
2.22
-0.20
Jose Valverde
19 1/3
5.30
5.59
-0.28
Jose Ortega
11 2/3
3.48
3.86
-0.38
Jeremy Bonderman
14 1/3
2.00
2.51
-0.51
Joaquin Benoit
54 2/3
0.92
1.48
-0.56
Jose Alvarez
4   
14.95
15.75
-0.80

Villarreal and Valverde are no longer with us.  Other pitchers like Dotel, Porcello and Alvarez have too small of a sample size to tell us much.  It looks like Putkonen, who has a nice ERA, has been overvalued according to his RE24.  And Benoit, who has been extremely good in his role this year, looks to be even better by looking at RE24.  

Monday, July 15, 2013

The 2013 All Stat Team

Last week the 2013 All-Star Team was announced.  Just like every other year, sports journalists and fans complain about snubs and immediately point to the manager to fault (even though nearly 79% of the AL roster and 71% of the NL roster is filled out by a vote of some kind.  Fans chose the starting 9 in the AL/8 in NL and the final roster spot while the players, coaches and managers vote in 8 pitchers and 9 reserves in the AL/8 reserves in the NL).  Then the manager has to make sure every team is represented when he selects the final spots.  The manager really doesn't have enough leverage on the roster to make sure that everyone deserving is on.

There are interesting debates that pop up during this time.  Do we eliminate fan voting altogether?  Do we get rid of the rule that every team must be represented?  Do we focus on the "stars" more and ignore players who are only having good half years?  Do we come up with a calculation based on certain stats to determine the rosters?  Do we expand the rosters?  

My spin on this is that I like to recognize those players who are having great years statically this year, even if it is luck-based.   I also like the rule that every team must be represented.  Because I'm using stats to determine my roster, I'm just going to call it what it is: The All Stat Team.


American League:


Starters:


POS Name Team PA AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ OPS+ fWAR rWAR
C
MIN
403
0.320
0.402
0.473
0.380
142
140
3.9
4.0
1B
BAL
393
0.315
0.392
0.717
0.458
192
193
5.1
4.5
2B
NYY
409
0.302
0.386
0.531
0.385
143
150
3.7
4.8
3B
DET
428
0.365
0.458
0.674
0.473
204
200
6.0
5.5
SS
DET
375
0.303
0.361
0.447
0.352
120
116
2.7
2.3
LF
LAA
426
0.322
0.399
0.565
0.410
166
169
5.7
4.6
CF
BAL
413
0.296
0.324
0.501
0.355
122
121
2.5
2.8
RF
TOR
390
0.254
0.351
0.493
0.365
129
127
3.1
2.8
DH
BOS
331
0.317
0.402
0.606
0.418
164
167
2.9
2.7

Starting Pitcher:


Name Team IP ERA ERA+ WHIP K% FIP FIP- fWAR rWAR
Felix Hernandez SEA
138 2/3
2.53 149 1.10
25.6%
2.66
64
4.2
4.7

Reserves:


POS Name Team PA AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ OPS+ fWAR rWAR
C
CLE
329
0.275
0.382
0.466
0.367
137
141
1.7
2.4
C
HOU
329
0.269
0.331
0.475
0.346
119
120
2.2
2.4
1B
TOR
399
0.264
0.353
0.532
0.380
140
137
2.7
2.3
2B
CLE
374
0.301
0.383
0.514
0.385
149
154
3.4
4.2
2B
BOS
432
0.316
0.396
0.436
0.365
127
125
3.7
4.5
3B
OAK
391
0.310
0.379
0.522
0.387
149
151
4.3
4.3
3B
TB
399
0.278
0.356
0.507
0.367
137
140
4.3
3.6
3B
BAL
435
0.310
0.337
0.470
0.349
118
117
4.2
5.0
SS
OAK
383
0.295
0.364
0.424
0.346
122
121
1.8
1.2
OF
TOR
346
0.263
0.332
0.484
0.354
122
119
3.5
3.1
OF
BOS
419
0.305
0.368
0.422
0.345
114
113
3.5
3.4
OF
TB
399
0.267
0.335
0.449
0.341
119
119
2.7
2.8

Pitchers:


Name Team IP ERA ERA+ WHIP K% FIP FIP- fWAR rWAR
DET
129 2/3
3.19
135
0.98
30.1%
2.68
65
4.0
3.8
CWS
120
2.85
154
1.01
27.4%
2.94
71
3.2
4.6
TEX
119 1/3
3.02
144
1.05
32.5%
3.22
75
3.0
3.0
DET
126
3.50
123
1.34
23.3%
3.23
78
3.0
2.9
OAK
126 2/3
2.70
144
1.11
14.0%
3.23
83
2.6
3.6
TEX
125 2/3
3.08
141
1.28
23.1%
2.87
67
3.8
2.9
NYY
118 2/3
2.65
153
1.05
17.7%
3.62
87
2.3
3.2
CWS
36 2/3
0.74
599
1.15
30.3%
1.53
38
2.0
2.5
KC
35   
1.80
231
0.91
44.4%
1.32
33
1.6
1.0
MIN
34 2/3
1.82
231
0.81
35.9%
1.79
45
1.3
1.4
TEX
39 2/3
1.36
321
0.76
28.4%
2.43
57
1.5
2.1
DET
56 2/3
1.91
226
0.97
26.0%
2.04
50
1.5
2.2


National League:


Starters:


POS Name Team PA AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ OPS+ fWAR rWAR
C
SF
367
0.325
0.395
0.536
0.398
162
167
4.1
4.2
1B
ARI
406
0.313
0.395
0.557
0.405
157
158
4.2
4.8
2B
STL
408
0.321
0.394
0.497
0.386
152
146
4.4
3.9
3B
NYM
399
0.304
0.396
0.507
0.389
155
154
4.9
4.9
SS
MIL
397
0.325
0.363
0.487
0.367
134
129
3.2
3.7
LF
COL
395
0.302
0.370
0.610
0.414
153
148
4.5
4.7
CF
MIL
362
0.296
0.338
0.534
0.371
136
132
4.6
5.7
RF
STL
350
0.309
0.346
0.533
0.378
146
140
1.7
2.0
DH
CIN
429
0.318
0.434
0.506
0.402
157
153
3.7
4.2

Starting Pitcher:


Name Team IP ERA ERA+ WHIP K% FIP FIP- fWAR rWAR
STL
146 2/3
2.45
151
1.01
22.7%
2.23
60
4.5
4.8

Reserves:


POS Name Team PA AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ OPS+ fWAR rWAR
C
STL
350
0.341
0.386
0.489
0.378
146
142
4.2
4.0
C
PIT
302
0.239
0.346
0.394
0.330
111
110
3.0
3.1
1B
STL
381
0.333
0.378
0.494
0.378
146
140
2.1
1.7
2B
SF
356
0.316
0.367
0.400
0.339
121
122
2.1
2.2
3B
PIT
334
0.250
0.311
0.516
0.351
126
130
2.5
2.2
SS
WAS
389
0.281
0.328
0.486
0.349
123
121
3.5
2.6
SS
SD
363
0.291
0.373
0.396
0.343
120
122
2.8
2.7
SS
COL
265
0.332
0.400
0.608
0.425
161
156
3.5
3.1
OF
PIT
388
0.302
0.376
0.471
0.365
136
139
4.2
4.8
OF
CIN
435
0.287
0.425
0.468
0.393
152
142
3.1
3.0
OF
COL
317
0.330
0.391
0.568
0.409
150
144
1.8
1.5
OF
PIT
401
0.291
0.342
0.462
0.349
124
126
3.6
4.0

Pitchers:


Name Team IP ERA ERA+ WHIP K% FIP FIP- fWAR rWAR
NYM
130   
2.35
153
0.92
29.3%
2.17
59
4.2
4.3
LAD
145 1/3
1.98
181
0.91
24.8%
2.52
68
3.9
5.2
PHI
138 2/3
2.86
135
1.00
23.1%
2.97
78
3.0
4.3
COL
113   
3.50
127
1.26
14.6%
3.18
73
2.8
4.1
ARI
130 1/3
2.35
164
1.00
21.2%
3.18
80
2.7
3.5
WAS
132 1/3
2.58
146
0.97
18.2%
3.08
81
2.8
3.4
CHC
122 2/3
2.79
141
1.04
17.6%
3.59
91
2.2
3.4
MIA
104 2/3
2.75
140
1.08
24.3%
3.22
84
1.9
2.6
PIT
44 1/3
0.81
441
0.79
27.1%
1.62
43
1.6
2.0
ATL
35 1/3
1.53
255
0.99
39.1%
2.30
61
1.1
1.6
NYM
43   
2.30
157
0.91
22.9%
2.06
56
1.4
1.3
PIT
40 2/3
1.99
180
0.86
39.6%
1.34
35
1.8
1.1

I'm not too concerned with injury replacements.  

Disagree?  Post your team in the comments.