Showing posts with label Al Alburquerque. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Alburquerque. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

Al Aburquerque Is Being Aggressive in the Strike Zone

Al Alburquerque has only faced 24 batters so far this season, so small sample caveats apply.  However, he's only given up 1 walk for a walk rate of 4.2%, which is a much better rate than he has shown in the past (15.9% in 2011; 15.1% in 2012; and 15.5% in 2013).  Based on his plate discipline numbers, there is evidence to suggest a change in approach to attack the strike zone more aggressively this year:


Year F-Strike% Zone%
2011 51.7% 43.5%
2012 54.7% 41.4%
2013 56.8% 41.8%
2014 66.7% 59.7%

His percentage of pitches in the strike zone is up almost 20% from past seasons and even his first pitch strike percentage is up about 10% from last year.  

One of the reasons for this could be his pitch selection.  Alburquerque's best pitch is his slider and while he's always thrown it at a high rate, he's throwing it even more often than in the past (according to Brooks Baseball):

Year 4-Seamer Sinker Slider
2011
38.1%
4.8%
57.1%
2012
5.8%
31.4%
62.8%
2013
5.2%
29.4%
65.4%
2014
16.9%
9.1%
74.0%

This is concerning from an injury standpoint, but again it is a small sample.  

Visually, this chart shows where in the strike zone he is pitching:




Compare this to the 3 years before:



The bottom right corner is still a hot spot for Alburquerque (mostly his slider) but it can been seen in the 2014 chart there are more hot spots in the strike zone.  An encouraging sign for someone prone to walking a lot of batters.

Of course when a pitcher is throwing more strikes, there is the potential for hitters to make more contact:


Year Contact% Z-Contact% O-Contact%
2011
58.8%
74.4%
38.6%
2012
58.5%
66.7%
47.5%
2013
62.4%
80.3%
41.4%
2014
81.1%
92.0%
58.3%

Alburquerque has a fairly high BABIP (.333), but his line drive rate is only 15.8%, down from 25.4% last year, so batters aren't hitting him as hard as last year.  So even though hitters are making more contact, they aren't making hard contact, which is a good sign.  Therefore, there might be some regression here as the season goes on:

Year BABIP LD% GB% FB%
2011
0.250
13.6%
56.8%
29.6%
2012
0.222
11.1%
63.0%
25.9%
2013
0.312
25.4%
40.4%
34.2%
2014
0.333
15.8%
42.1%
42.1%

Visually, we can see where he's been given up the hits in the strike zone:


Alburquerque has given up 7 hits and almost half of them, 3, have been right down the middle.  Maybe he's being to aggressive in throwing strikes?  It's one thing to throw strikes, but you don't want to put in on a tee for batters.  
   
Another thing that Alburquerque is doing that we're not used to seeing are low strikeouts, only 4 or 16.7%.  In 2011 his strikeout rate was 36.8%; in 2012 it was 34%; and in 2013 it was 31.8%.  The low strikeouts are making his Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) look not as good as in the past:

Year K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP ERA
2011
13.92
6.02
0.00
2.08
1.87
2012
12.15
5.40
0.00
2.19
0.68
2013
12.86
6.24
0.92
3.72
4.59
2014
6.75
1.69
1.69
4.55
5.06

Alburquerque showing better control and command of his pitches is a good sign.  If he can keep it up, while still maintaining a low line drive rate and increase his strikeouts to where they were the last 3 years, he can possibly be one of the best relief pitchers in the league.  However, it's only been a little more than 5 innings, so it could just be a blip on the radar.  It's something to keep an eye on, though as the season progresses.  

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Alburquerque Struggles With Men on Base

Saturday night the Tigers enter the 9th inning trailing 1-0 when Leyland summons Al Alburquerque out of the bullpen.  Groans ensued throughout Twitter, yet I felt confident.  My "eye test" told me that Alburquerque does alright starting an inning and he didn't disappoint, pitching a clean 1-2-3 inning.  However, using memory as any kind of reliable source is asking for trouble, so onto Baseball-reference.  As it turns out, I was a little bit wrong on Alburquerque; he's not just good with the bases empty - he's great.


Situation PA AVG OBP SLG
Bases Empty
98
0.152
0.316
0.177
Men on Base
98
0.313
0.408
0.542

Oh, I just love it when the sample size perfectly match.  These numbers obviously show a lot; Alburquerque appears to be one of the best relievers in the game when no one is on base, yet pitches like a AAAA-player as soon as someone is occupying one of his bases.  There are several explanations that range from random variance to pitch usage.  But the one that immediately comes to mind is that his delivery may be off when pitching out of the stretch.  

Going back prior to his 1 full year in the majors in 2011 when he had a 1.87 ERA and a 2.08 FIP, here were his numbers in the same situations:


Situation PA AVG OBP SLG
Bases Empty
80
0.182
0.325
0.182
Men on Base
102
0.110
0.260
0.122

Alburquerque certainly looked capable of pitching with men on base before.  Again, it could be, random variance, confidence/mental issues, but the "what's wrong with Al Alburquerque" could be as simple as a mechanical adjustment when pitching out of the stretch.  Now I'm not one to post videos comparing how a pitcher looks when pitching out of the wind-up vs. out of the stretch.  Honestly, I wouldn't know what to look for.  I'll leave that up to the bloggers who are smarter than me.  And I really hope someone takes on that project.  

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Using RE24 to Evaluate Relievers

Run expectation is one way to measure a player's effectiveness, either on offense or pitching.  In every 24-out situation, there's a different run expectation depending on the the baserunners and outs (the inning and score is irrelevant in RE24).  The difference between the run expectation at the start of a PA and the end of the PA gets charged to both the hitter and pitcher.  FanGraphs provides an example using the Red Sox and Rockies 2007 World Series game.  At the start of an inning the run expectation was .52 (this is just the league runs/league innings), then Ellsbury doubled that changed the run expectation to 1.15.  The difference between 1.15 and .52 is 0.63.  Therefore Ellsbury gets charged with +0.63 and Cook gets charged with -0.63.  

During the course of the season, these run expectation differences get added and subtracted to the player's total and at the end of the season they get a cumulative total that shows how much better they've been than league average.  Run expectation is extremely useful in generating linear weights which then can be applied to stats such as wOBA.  However, many analysts agree that RE24 can be very useful in proving relief pitcher value because they often come in and leave in the middle of an inning.  Say a starter loads the bases in the 7th inning and a reliever comes in and gives up a 3-run double and then a strikeout.  All 3 runs get charged to the starter while the reliever gets a scoreless 1/3 of an inning.  ERA doesn't properly show what happened, but RE24 does. 

The table below shows the Tigers relievers' RE24 as of games played through 8/31 provided by FanGraphs:


Player IP RE24
54 2/3
19.91
69   
16.70
14 1/3
3.50
14 1/3
1.57
11 2/3
0.93
2   
0.84
26   
-0.11
18   
-0.35
22 2/3
-2.18
19 1/3
-2.38
39   
-3.27
33   
-3.73
4   
-4.78
4 2/3
-6.02
36   
-6.46
4 1/3
-8.73

Tangotiger recently showed us how we can put RE24 on a RA9 or ERA scale:

If it helps, we can recast RE24 into an RA9 scale (i.e., similar to ERA) as follows.  Say the league average is .48 runs per inning.  Say you have a pitcher that has an RE24 of +40 runs and has pitched 200 innings.  That means the league average is .48 x 200 = 96 runs, and our pitcher here is 40 runs better than that, or 56 runs allowed.  So, his (RE24-based) RA9 is simply 56/200*9 = 2.52.
So far there have been 16,965 runs allowed in 36,380 1/3 IP for a league run/inning of 0.47 so far in 2013.  Using Joaquin Benoit as an example, he has pitched 54 2/3 innings; the league average would allow 0.47 * 54 2/3 = 25.49 runs.  Benoit has been 19.91 runs better or (25.49-19.91) 5.58 runs.  5.58 divided by 54 2/3 times 9 = 0.92.  The table below shows all of the Tigers relievers using this new metric (which I'm calling reRA9):


Player IP reRA9
Rick Porcello
2   
0.42
Joaquin Benoit
54 2/3
0.92
Jeremy Bonderman
14 1/3
2.00
Drew Smyly
69   
2.02
Jose Veras
14 1/3
3.21
Jose Ortega
11 2/3
3.48
Bruce Rondon
26   
4.23
Evan Reed
18   
4.37
Al Alburquerque
39   
4.95
Luke Putkonen
22 2/3
5.06
Darin Downs
33   
5.21
Jose Valverde
19 1/3
5.30
Phil Coke
36   
5.81
Jose Alvarez
4   
14.95
Octavio Dotel
4 2/3
15.81
Brayan Villarreal
4 1/3
22.33
We could then compare the pitcher's reRA9 to his ERA to see if he's been overvalued or undervalued:

Player IP reRA9 ERA Difference
Octavio Dotel
4 2/3
15.81
13.50
2.31
Luke Putkonen
22 2/3
5.06
2.78
2.28
Brayan Villarreal
4 1/3
22.33
20.77
1.56
Evan Reed
18   
4.37
3.00
1.37
Phil Coke
36   
5.81
5.00
0.81
Bruce Rondon
26   
4.23
3.81
0.43
Rick Porcello
2   
0.42
0.00
0.42
Al Alburquerque
39   
4.95
4.85
0.11
Jose Veras
14 1/3
3.21
3.14
0.07
Darin Downs
33   
5.21
5.18
0.03
Drew Smyly
69   
2.02
2.22
-0.20
Jose Valverde
19 1/3
5.30
5.59
-0.28
Jose Ortega
11 2/3
3.48
3.86
-0.38
Jeremy Bonderman
14 1/3
2.00
2.51
-0.51
Joaquin Benoit
54 2/3
0.92
1.48
-0.56
Jose Alvarez
4   
14.95
15.75
-0.80

Villarreal and Valverde are no longer with us.  Other pitchers like Dotel, Porcello and Alvarez have too small of a sample size to tell us much.  It looks like Putkonen, who has a nice ERA, has been overvalued according to his RE24.  And Benoit, who has been extremely good in his role this year, looks to be even better by looking at RE24.  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Who's Your Tiger Closer?

The Tigers are obviously going by a closer by committee, at least to start the season.  Jim Leyland brilliantly managed the 9th inning of the first game by sending Joaquin Benoit back out to get one out in the 9th inning before taking him out and using Phil Coke to get the last two outs.  The opposing batters were right-handed hitter Josh Willingham, left-handed hitter Justin Morneau and switch hitter Ryan Doumit.  By using Benoit against the right-hander and Coke against the left-hander and the switch hitter (where he does significantly worse against left-handed pitchers) is what made the move brilliant.  He went unconventional and played the match-ups instead of going by the unwritten rule that the closer has to start the 9th inning.

Below is a table generated by Baseball Reference's Play Index (which is on a free trial until April 15th).  I set the parameters from 2009-2013, which only included how they performed in the 9th inning.  I then deleted out everyone that isn't currently in the Tigers bullpen: 


Rk Player Split From To G ERA IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BF WHIP BA OBP SLG OPS
11 Al Alburquerque 9th inning 2011 2011 11 1.08 8.1 6 1 1 0 8 2 16 1 40 1.680 .194 .375 .194 .569
13 Brayan Villarreal 9th inning 2011 2012 12 2.89 9.1 6 4 3 0 8 0 10 0 41 1.500 .182 .341 .212 .554
15 Joaquin Benoit 9th inning 2011 2013 31 3.67 27.0 18 12 11 3 7 1 29 0 102 0.926 .191 .245 .340 .586
17 Phil Coke 9th inning 2010 2013 34 4.23 27.2 29 12 13 1 13 3 17 1 115 1.518 .299 .384 .392 .776
19 Darin Downs 9th inning 2012 2012 2 4.50 2.0 2 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 9 1.500 .250 .333 .375 .708
22 Octavio Dotel 9th inning 2012 2012 12 12.38 8.0 14 10 11 1 5 2 6 0 43 2.375 .378 .442 .541 .982
Generated 4/2/2013.

Obviously, we're dealing with small sample sizes here.  Only Joaquin Benoit and Phil Coke have significant innings in the 9th inning, and even then it's only 27 innings.  So this has to be taken with a grain of salt, but it's still interesting to look at.  Some notes:

Al Alburquerque and Brayan Villarreal have low ERA's, but very high WHIP's due to a lot of walks.  

Joaquin Benoit's looks like the best option.  Not only does he have a lot of experience (at least more than anyone other than Coke), but he's held opponents to only a .191 AVG, he has more than a K/inning and very low walk totals.  

Phil Coke's ERA doesn't look too bad, but his WHIP and opponents batting line against does, probably due to facing right-handed batters.

Darin Downs only has 2 innings of experience pitching the 9th inning, not nearly enough to  properly evaluate (then again, technically neither is 8-9 innings).

Octavio Dotel surprised me the most.  He has the most experience closing out games, yet he has the highest ERA.  This is a good example of why small samples shouldn't be used, as he probably wouldn't be this awful if given the bulk of the save opportunities.  Also, it's only restricting him to 2012, since I set the parameters to only Tigers pitchers (2012 was the only year he's pitched as a Tiger).  Luckily, we can get the information from his total years in the 9th inning from 2009-2012:
  
Rk Player Split From To G SO ERA IP H R ER HR BB IBB HBP BF WHIP BA OBP SLG OPS
44 Octavio Dotel 9th inning 2009 2012 76 74 4.82 65.1 58 41 35 9 25 3 3 280 1.270 .235 .308 .429 .737
Generated 4/2/2013.

Now we have a much higher sample size, much more than anyone else currently in the Tigers bullpen, but the ERA is still alarming.  

Maybe ERA isn't the best stat to use.  One sabermetric stat is Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) , which only uses home runs, walks, hit by pitches and strikeouts (events that the pitcher has the most control over).  The formula is ((13*HR)+(3*(BB+HBP))-(2*K))/IP + constant.  The constant puts it on the same scale as ERA.  For simplicity's sake, I'm going to use 3.2 as the constant.


FIP
Darin Downs
1.70
Al Alburquerque
2.60
Joaquin Benoit
3.27
Brayan Villarreal
3.63
Phil Coke
3.96
Octavio Dotel*
4.01


I'm still dismissing Downs due to a small sample size (again, it's not like anyone other than Dotel has a big sample anyway).  *I'm using the full 65 1/3 inning sample from Dotel in this calculation, and he still comes off as the weakest one (but not much worse than Phil Coke).  I find that very interesting.  In the meantime, Alburquerque, Benoit and Villarreal still look like very capable options.  




  • Al Alburquerque
  • Joaquin Benoit
  • Brayan Villarreal
  • Phil Coke
  • Darin Downs
  • Octavio Dotel
More polls: Iphone headset