It's the end of May and just past the ¼ mark of the season, which means there's enough playing time for people to stop using the "it's early" and
"small sample size" excuses. One such instance is Alex Avila, who has gotten off to a horrible start, hitting only .179/.256/.304 with a 51 wRC+ in 125 PA.
In the meantime, Brayan Pena has much better numbers, hitting .275/.296/.412 with an 88 wRC+, but in only 55 PA. Tiger fans are fed up and want a change.
As well as posts from Detroit Tigers.com message board and Motown Sports message board.
Looking deeper in the numbers, it doesn't appear that Pena would be much of an upgrade.
First of all, historical stats say that Avila is a better hitter:
Brayan Pena:
| Year
|
PA
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wOBA
|
wRC+
|
2010
|
174
|
0.253
|
0.306
|
0.335
|
6.9%
|
15.5%
|
0.288
|
75
|
2011
|
240
|
0.248
|
0.288
|
0.338
|
5.0%
|
10.0%
|
0.277
|
70
|
2012
|
226
|
0.236
|
0.262
|
0.321
|
4.0%
|
10.6%
|
0.254
|
55
|
2010-2012
|
640
|
0.245
|
0.284
|
0.331
|
5.2%
|
11.7%
|
0.272
|
66
|
Alex Avila:
| Year
|
PA
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wOBA
|
wRC+
|
2010
|
333
|
0.228
|
0.316
|
0.340
|
10.8%
|
21.3%
|
0.299
|
81
|
2011
|
551
|
0.295
|
0.389
|
0.506
|
13.2%
|
23.8%
|
0.384
|
141
|
2012
|
434
|
0.243
|
0.352
|
0.384
|
14.1%
|
24.0%
|
0.327
|
104
|
2010-2012
|
1318
|
0.260
|
0.358
|
0.423
|
12.9%
|
23.2%
|
0.343
|
114
|
Even if Avila's 2011 season gets heavily discounted because of a fluky career year, his 81 wRC+ in 2010 is still better than any of the last 3 years by Pena. The only
year that Pena has done better than an 81 wRC+ and had significant playing time was in 2009, when he had a 94 wRC+. The same principle of fluky career year could
also be applied to that year too since he hasn't come close to matching that until the 13 games he's played so far this year.
So maybe Pena is doing something different. Maybe he's changed his approach to become a more successful hitter?
| Year |
BABIP |
LD% |
GB% |
FB% |
2010
|
0.295
|
16.3%
|
45.0%
|
38.8%
|
2011
|
0.261
|
22.9%
|
44.3%
|
32.8%
|
2012
|
0.253
|
24.6%
|
48.2%
|
27.2%
|
2013
|
0.279
|
11.1%
|
57.8%
|
31.1%
|
Career
|
0.266
|
20.9%
|
48.8%
|
30.3%
|
There's definitely a huge increase of ground balls, and a decrease in line drives. Pena has 14 hits and 7 of them have been hit on the ground (including 3 infield hits). That's 50% of his hits coming from ground balls compared to 34% in both 2012 and his career. Pena isn't the fleetest of foot, so to have him have continued success by hitting ground balls instead of line
drives isn't very likely. This is likely random variance from only playing in 13 games.
Here are his plate discipline numbers:
| Year
|
O-Swing%
|
Z-Swing%
|
Swing%
|
O-Contact%
|
Z-Contact%
|
Contact%
|
Zone%
|
2010
|
31.4%
|
64.5%
|
48.5%
|
65.6%
|
90.5%
|
82.7%
|
51.7%
|
2011
|
28.7%
|
61.0%
|
45.1%
|
79.4%
|
93.9%
|
89.4%
|
50.6%
|
2012
|
31.9%
|
60.4%
|
46.5%
|
76.7%
|
94.5%
|
88.5%
|
51.1%
|
2013
|
29.5%
|
63.0%
|
45.9%
|
67.7%
|
95.2%
|
86.2%
|
48.8%
|
Career
|
30.5%
|
61.2%
|
45.8%
|
76.7%
|
93.5%
|
87.9%
|
49.8%
|
There isn't much difference in his 2013 numbers than his recent seasons or his career totals. The stat with the most difference is his O-Contact rate is
lower, which means when he swings at pitches out of the strike zone, he's missing more often. That is the opposite of an improvement.
What about Avila? Is he doing something different to cause less success?
| Year
|
BABIP
|
LD%
|
GB%
|
FB%
|
2010
|
0.278
|
21.5%
|
43.5%
|
35.0%
|
2011
|
0.366
|
21.7%
|
37.8%
|
40.5%
|
2012
|
0.313
|
23.8%
|
46.4%
|
29.8%
|
2013
|
0.219
|
19.7%
|
50.0%
|
30.3%
|
Career
|
0.316
|
21.7%
|
42.8%
|
35.5%
|
Avila's BABIP is down almost 100 points from last year and his career. His batted ball data doesn't have a dramatic change from his previous seasons and
his career. Therefore, it's reasonable to conclude that Avila is either suffering from BABIP bad luck or an injury is causing it.
Avila's plate disciple numbers:
| Year
|
O-Swing%
|
Z-Swing%
|
Swing%
|
O-Contact%
|
Z-Contact%
|
Contact%
|
Zone%
|
2010
|
23.4%
|
64.3%
|
44.2%
|
52.3%
|
86.8%
|
77.8%
|
50.7%
|
2011
|
24.7%
|
60.2%
|
43.0%
|
49.0%
|
86.1%
|
75.8%
|
51.5%
|
2012
|
20.9%
|
58.7%
|
39.3%
|
51.6%
|
82.1%
|
73.8%
|
48.8%
|
2013
|
20.3%
|
62.8%
|
42.0%
|
46.3%
|
79.3%
|
71.5%
|
51.0%
|
Career
|
22.6%
|
61.1%
|
42.1%
|
49.9%
|
84.7%
|
75.5%
|
50.5%
|
Avila's main problem is his Contact%, both in the strike zone and out of the zone. He's swinging and missing more often than he ever did, which definitely
explains the increase in strikeouts (28.8% in 2013) and decrease in walks (9.6% in 2013). It's hard to imagine a 26 year old suddenly become a weaker
hitter than he was a year ago, so I'm leaning towards the injury theory.
Finally, there's ZIPS rest of the season stats. While these stats don't show exactly what will happen in the future, they do show who is likely to be
better for the rest of the season.
| Player
|
PA
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wOBA
|
wRC+
|
Brayan Pena
|
164
|
0.260
|
0.293
|
0.369
|
4.3%
|
11.8%
|
0.290
|
77
|
Alex Avila
|
351
|
0.236
|
0.334
|
0.390
|
12.6%
|
25.3%
|
0.320
|
97
|
Alex Avila may need to be replaced (or DL'd), but the answer isn't Brayan Pena.
When Rick Porcello decided to ditch his slider this year, most people expected that it would be his curveball to show marked improvement since that was the pitch that he was substituting the slider for. Well so far, it's
been the changeup that's shown much improvement.
According to Pitch f/x pitch values/100,
Porcello's changeup has a value of 3.63 so far this year. That's not only the best value pitch for Porcello this year, it's the best value pitch that he's ever had (0 is average, positive results are above average, negative results are below average).
| Year
|
4-Seam FB
|
2-Seam FB
|
Cutter
|
Slider
|
Curveball
|
Changeup
|
2009
|
0.92
|
0.22
|
-1.38
|
-2.94
|
-1.49
|
-1.20
|
2010
|
0.45
|
0.09
|
|
-1.77
|
-3.81
|
0.44
|
2011
|
-0.13
|
-0.65
|
|
0.18
|
-0.84
|
-0.45
|
2012
|
-0.68
|
0.14
|
|
-3.84
|
0.65
|
0.07
|
2013
|
-2.10
|
-2.05
|
|
1.42
|
0.35
|
3.63
|
Of course, it's still May and so, "beware of small samples." Porcello has thrown a total of 543 pitches so far this year and only 98 of them have been
changeups. FanGraphs even tells us that these pitch values have little predictive values:
This statistic has limited predictive power. It can show you what pitches a pitcher has had success with in the past, but you should be careful in extrapolating those results and projecting the future. It’s a descriptive statistic, not a predictive one.
Looking deeper in Pitch f/x, we
can see why his changeup has been so valuable.
| Changeups
|
PA
|
HR
|
BB
|
K
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
2009
|
100
|
3
|
8
|
12
|
0.275
|
0.333
|
0.429
|
2010
|
80
|
0
|
1
|
13
|
0.253
|
0.263
|
0.304
|
2011
|
78
|
1
|
0
|
14
|
0.253
|
0.260
|
0.427
|
2012
|
103
|
3
|
7
|
14
|
0.240
|
0.291
|
0.406
|
2013
|
35
|
0
|
1
|
9
|
0.176
|
0.200
|
0.206
|
The one stat that jumps out at me the most is the strikeouts. Already Porcello has 9 strikeouts on the changeup in 35 PA, 5 less than his career high that
took him 103 PA last year and 78 PA in 2011. Has Porcello finally gotten his strikeout pitch?
Here's how Porcello's changeup compares to his other pitches:
2013
|
PA
|
HR
|
BB
|
K
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
2-Seam FB
|
58
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
0.415
|
0.466
|
0.528
|
4-Seam FB
|
27
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
0.269
|
0.296
|
0.654
|
Curveball
|
17
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0.125
|
0.176
|
0.375
|
Changeup
|
35
|
0
|
1
|
9
|
0.176
|
0.200
|
0.206
|
Again, the one stat that jumps out at me is the strikeouts. Historically, Porcello has gotten most of his strikeouts on his 2-Seamer (or sinker as he calls
it). But this year it's come from the changeup. "Beware of the small samples" again; things could even out by the end of the year. However, I would like to
see Porcello throw his changeup a little more often to see if there's something there. He already is throwing it more than he has in the past:
| Year
|
Changeup %
|
2009
|
14.4%
|
2010
|
11.7%
|
2011
|
11.4%
|
2012
|
13.6%
|
2013
|
18.1%
|
Although, I'd like to see it be his 2nd most frequent pitch, right after his 2-Seam FB (sinker):
| Pitch Type |
Percentage |
4-Seam FB %
|
24.3%
|
2-Seam FB %
|
38.9%
|
Slider %
|
0.7%
|
Curveball %
|
18.1%
|
Changeup %
|
18.1%
|
Max Scherzer
is having a really good year this year, especially so if ERA is ignored. In defense independent stats, Scherzer ranks as
one of the best starting pitchers in all of baseball
so far this year:
| Stat
|
Value
|
Rank
|
fWAR
|
2.0
|
T-2nd
|
FIP
|
1.87
|
T-2nd
|
xFIP
|
2.30
|
3rd
|
tERA
|
2.18
|
3rd
|
SIERA
|
2.27
|
2nd
|
However, his ERA is 3.61, which ranks him at 56 among starting pitchers. What's going on? Well it seems it all has to do with his left on base
percentage (LOB%). His LOB% is 63.1%,
ranking him 8th lowest
and well below the league average rate of 73.3%. If these runners aren't left on base, it means they are scoring and raising the pitcher's ERA. It's
been long thought of that this stat is a luck stat and will eventually even out by the end of the season to around league average.
In 2012, FanGraphs introduced fielding dependent pitching,
suggesting that pitchers do have some control over balls in play and that it's not all luck (as FIP only factors in strikeouts, walks, hit batters and
home runs). One of those stats was LOB-Wins, stating that there could be some skill involved in stranding runners.
Below is how Scherzer has been in LOB-Wins while with the Tigers:
| Year
|
LOB-Wins
|
2010
|
0.3
|
2011
|
0.4
|
2012
|
0.6
|
2013
|
-0.9
|
The -0.9
ranks him 2nd lowest among starting pitchers
. However, he's always been able to have a positive number, which means he's been a little bit better than league average, as shown:
| Year
|
LOB%
|
League
LOB%
|
2010
|
74.9%
|
72.2%
|
2011
|
73.7%
|
72.5%
|
2012
|
76.5%
|
72.5%
|
2013
|
63.1%
|
73.3%
|
One of two things is happening. Either he's doing something differently that has changed his skill (either mentally, mechanically or something else) or
it truly is luck and he'll regress back to mean. If it is luck (unfortunate luck in this case) or something mechanical that can be fixed, then Scherzer
is primed for a really good year this year as he regresses back to his career norm.
It seems like this discussion was going on last year. An underperforming player is hitting 5th while not a great option, but seemingly
better one, is hitting lower in the order. Only this time the underperforming player is
Victor Martinez
instead of
Delmon Young
and both times that seemingly better player looks to be
Jhonny Peralta
.
With a little more than a month into the season, we're at a point where "it's still early" is becoming less and less of a valid argument. Victor
Martinez has gotten off to a very slow start and is only hitting .220/.277/.297 with 1 HR and a 55 OPS+. Meanwhile Jhonny Peralta is having a nice
bounce-back season hitting .298/.339/.404 with 2 HR and a 99 OPS+. It appears that V-Mart has picked it up lately hitting .279/.273/.442 over his last
10 games, but Jhonny has kept pace hitting .275/.311/.400 over his last 10 games. The level of competition should also be factored in too as the Tigers
just finished a 4-game sweep of the lowly Houston Astros.
Against other 5th place hitters, the Tigers are 23rd in MLB:
| Rk |
|
G |
GS |
PA |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
CS |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
sOPS+ |
| 1 |
BAL |
35 |
33 |
138 |
114 |
22 |
35 |
9 |
0 |
11 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
37 |
.307 |
.399 |
.675 |
1.074 |
187 |
| 2 |
CLE |
32 |
30 |
127 |
108 |
21 |
33 |
4 |
0 |
7 |
23 |
2 |
0 |
16 |
29 |
.306 |
.402 |
.537 |
.939 |
155 |
| 3 |
COL |
32 |
32 |
140 |
128 |
20 |
41 |
8 |
1 |
6 |
23 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
23 |
.320 |
.371 |
.539 |
.910 |
146 |
| 4 |
OAK |
39 |
34 |
152 |
129 |
26 |
37 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
22 |
4 |
0 |
19 |
33 |
.287 |
.384 |
.481 |
.865 |
136 |
| 5 |
KCR |
29 |
29 |
121 |
109 |
14 |
36 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
.330 |
.380 |
.468 |
.848 |
131 |
| 6 |
ARI |
35 |
33 |
147 |
134 |
18 |
42 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
12 |
27 |
.313 |
.367 |
.463 |
.830 |
126 |
| 7 |
SFG |
35 |
33 |
140 |
130 |
16 |
36 |
10 |
1 |
6 |
19 |
5 |
0 |
9 |
27 |
.277 |
.321 |
.508 |
.829 |
123 |
| 8 |
LAA |
33 |
32 |
143 |
135 |
15 |
43 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
33 |
.319 |
.357 |
.467 |
.823 |
124 |
| 9 |
BOS |
34 |
33 |
139 |
118 |
17 |
27 |
9 |
0 |
7 |
23 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
45 |
.229 |
.338 |
.483 |
.821 |
122 |
| 10 |
TEX |
34 |
33 |
137 |
125 |
15 |
32 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
21 |
.256 |
.321 |
.496 |
.817 |
120 |
| 11 |
NYY |
39 |
31 |
129 |
110 |
18 |
24 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
19 |
.218 |
.333 |
.473 |
.806 |
118 |
| 12 |
TBR |
42 |
32 |
133 |
124 |
15 |
37 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
23 |
.298 |
.346 |
.452 |
.797 |
117 |
| 13 |
LAD |
45 |
32 |
135 |
116 |
7 |
32 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
16 |
.276 |
.378 |
.405 |
.783 |
116 |
| 14 |
HOU |
36 |
33 |
139 |
121 |
22 |
27 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
37 |
.223 |
.317 |
.455 |
.771 |
109 |
| 15 |
PHI |
42 |
34 |
136 |
121 |
12 |
32 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
26 |
.264 |
.338 |
.413 |
.751 |
105 |
| 16 |
STL |
40 |
32 |
132 |
126 |
11 |
40 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
.317 |
.348 |
.389 |
.737 |
102 |
| 17 |
CHC |
42 |
33 |
136 |
125 |
17 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
17 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
24 |
.240 |
.289 |
.440 |
.729 |
96 |
| 18 |
PIT |
40 |
32 |
132 |
112 |
8 |
26 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
20 |
.232 |
.348 |
.357 |
.706 |
95 |
| 19 |
MIL |
45 |
31 |
127 |
112 |
17 |
24 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
27 |
.214 |
.299 |
.384 |
.683 |
86 |
| 20 |
WSN |
34 |
32 |
128 |
117 |
12 |
26 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
32 |
.222 |
.281 |
.376 |
.657 |
78 |
| 21 |
MIA |
34 |
34 |
144 |
136 |
15 |
31 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
34 |
.228 |
.266 |
.382 |
.648 |
75 |
| 22 |
SDP |
39 |
33 |
139 |
120 |
9 |
29 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
17 |
36 |
.242 |
.331 |
.317 |
.648 |
80 |
| 23 |
DET |
35 |
30 |
139 |
125 |
10 |
30 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
12 |
14 |
.240 |
.302 |
.328 |
.630 |
73 |
| 24 |
CIN |
35 |
34 |
153 |
143 |
18 |
34 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
52 |
.238 |
.288 |
.336 |
.623 |
71 |
| 25 |
ATL |
39 |
32 |
135 |
126 |
16 |
26 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
42 |
.206 |
.252 |
.365 |
.617 |
67 |
| 26 |
MIN |
29 |
29 |
122 |
108 |
13 |
21 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
30 |
.194 |
.279 |
.296 |
.575 |
58 |
| 27 |
NYM |
45 |
29 |
124 |
112 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
35 |
.179 |
.242 |
.330 |
.572 |
55 |
| 28 |
CHW |
39 |
31 |
127 |
119 |
9 |
23 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
30 |
.193 |
.244 |
.303 |
.547 |
49 |
| 29 |
SEA |
36 |
34 |
143 |
130 |
10 |
24 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
40 |
.185 |
.252 |
.292 |
.544 |
49 |
| 30 |
TOR |
36 |
34 |
138 |
124 |
11 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
14 |
42 |
.161 |
.246 |
.226 |
.472 |
31 |
|
TOT |
1110 |
964 |
4075 |
3657 |
449 |
918 |
195 |
19 |
121 |
482 |
45 |
16 |
356 |
885 |
.251 |
.321 |
.414 |
.735 |
100 |
130 of those 139 PA have come from Victor Martinez. Substituting in Peralta's numbers would move the Tigers to around 15th. It's a small
improvement, but every little thing helps.
What about run production? Peralta doesn't have the reputation of driving in runs as Victor Martinez does and the 5th spot in the order kinda demands
run production. So far this year with runners in scoring position:
| Rk |
|
G |
PA |
AB |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
CS |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
sOPS+ |
| 1 |
Miguel Cabrera |
25 |
54 |
43 |
23 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
32 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
.535 |
.611 |
.837 |
1.448 |
293 |
| 2 |
Matt Tuiasosopo |
6 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
.400 |
.400 |
.900 |
1.300 |
247 |
| 3 |
Austin Jackson |
19 |
26 |
21 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
.286 |
.423 |
.619 |
1.042 |
182 |
| 4 |
Jhonny Peralta |
21 |
33 |
25 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
.360 |
.438 |
.520 |
.958 |
162 |
| 5 |
Prince Fielder |
23 |
47 |
38 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
8 |
.237 |
.340 |
.526 |
.867 |
134 |
| 6 |
Torii Hunter |
21 |
34 |
31 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
.290 |
.353 |
.290 |
.643 |
78 |
| 7 |
Victor Martinez |
25 |
45 |
37 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
.216 |
.311 |
.297 |
.608 |
67 |
| 8 |
Omar Infante |
19 |
27 |
24 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
.250 |
.296 |
.292 |
.588 |
62 |
| 9 |
Andy Dirks |
13 |
24 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
.250 |
.304 |
.250 |
.554 |
53 |
| 10 |
Don Kelly |
3 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
.250 |
.250 |
.250 |
.500 |
37 |
| 11 |
Brayan Pena |
6 |
12 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
.083 |
.083 |
.083 |
.167 |
-54 |
| 12 |
Alex Avila |
17 |
27 |
25 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
.040 |
.111 |
.040 |
.151 |
-57 |
| 13 |
Ramon Santiago |
3 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
.000 |
.000 |
.000 |
.000 |
-100 |
|
Team Total |
30 |
348 |
295 |
82 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
123 |
3 |
1 |
41 |
57 |
.278 |
.358 |
.427 |
.786 |
114 |
Generated 5/8/2013.
After
Miguel Cabrera
, Peralta has the 3rd highest OPS among regular starters (and
Austin Jackson
isn't going to be moved out of the lead-off spot any time soon). Now I don't believe he can keep it up, but Peralta is currently 350 points higher in OPS
than Victor Martinez in run producing situations. It only makes sense to put him in a better position in the batting order to take advantage of this, even
if only temporary.
Temporary is the key word here. We're only talking 33 and 45 PA respectively. That's a small sample and time will stabilize it. Peralta is a career
.273/.350/.432 hitter with runners in scoring position while V-Mart is a career .316/.403/.462 hitter with runners in scoring position. However it should
be noted that Martinez missed all of the 2012 season due to injury and may never be the hitter he once was.
Speaking of career numbers, Peralta hasn't historically been a good #5 hitter:
| I |
Split |
G |
GS |
PA |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
CS |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS ▾ |
tOPS+ |
|
Batting 2nd |
11 |
8 |
36 |
33 |
7 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
.333 |
.389 |
.727 |
1.116 |
191 |
|
Batting 6th |
299 |
296 |
1237 |
1121 |
135 |
317 |
61 |
3 |
39 |
151 |
3 |
1 |
96 |
247 |
.283 |
.338 |
.447 |
.785 |
109 |
|
Batting 4th |
138 |
137 |
610 |
551 |
85 |
149 |
42 |
3 |
15 |
87 |
1 |
1 |
48 |
120 |
.270 |
.331 |
.439 |
.770 |
105 |
|
Batting 3rd |
150 |
148 |
669 |
589 |
104 |
150 |
33 |
2 |
22 |
82 |
0 |
1 |
74 |
153 |
.255 |
.341 |
.430 |
.770 |
106 |
|
Batting 7th |
259 |
253 |
1050 |
954 |
113 |
260 |
53 |
7 |
26 |
140 |
1 |
5 |
77 |
201 |
.273 |
.326 |
.425 |
.750 |
100 |
|
Batting 9th |
87 |
76 |
293 |
268 |
32 |
68 |
17 |
3 |
8 |
32 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
63 |
.254 |
.298 |
.429 |
.727 |
92 |
|
Batting 8th |
110 |
102 |
402 |
359 |
45 |
94 |
12 |
2 |
9 |
36 |
2 |
3 |
37 |
88 |
.262 |
.335 |
.382 |
.717 |
93 |
|
Batting 5th |
248 |
247 |
1057 |
947 |
113 |
230 |
49 |
2 |
25 |
126 |
3 |
5 |
91 |
207 |
.243 |
.308 |
.378 |
.686 |
84 |
|
Batting 1st |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
1.000 |
|
|
|
Generated 5/8/2013.
It can also be argued that Victor Martinez has been suffering some unfortunate luck. More observation than statistical, but it seems like Martinez has been
hitting the ball well, only to have a great defensive catch being made. It might make sense to wait it out while his luck turns around. V-Mart's 19.6% LD
rate should be producing a higher BABIP than .236 (and therefor higher batting lines). Career-wise, V-Mart has a 20.5% LD rate and a .314 BABIP.
Tonight the Tigers play in a National League park for the first time this year, and so will be without a DH and Victor Martinez. Someone else will be
hitting 5th, most likely either
Andy Dirks
or Jhonny Peralta. Maybe they should think about making it more permanent, at least until Victor Martinez shows that he's the Victor Martinez of old again.